Mo. - Do. 08:00 bis 17:00 Uhr | Fr. 08:00 bis 14:00
Westdeutsches Prostatazentrum Logo

Da Vinci Operation

Literatur / Quellen

1 Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Samaratunga H, Zajdlewicz L, Teloken P, Dunglison N, Williams S, Lavin MF, Gardiner RA.: Robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-1060.

2 Ilic D1, Evans SM, Allan CA, Jung JH, Murphy D, Frydenberg M : Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12; BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):845-853

3 Capogrosso P et al.: Are We Improving Erectile Function Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy? Analysis of Patients Treated over the Last Decade. Eur Urol. 2019 Feb; 75(2): 221–22

4 Hu JC, gold KF, Pashos CL et al: Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2008 26(14):2278-2284

5 Abboudi H, Khan MS, Guru KA, Froghi S et al.: Learning curves for urological procedures: a systematic review.BJU Int. 2014 Oct;114(4):617-29. doi: 10.1111/bju.12315. Epub 2013 Oct 24.

6 Grimm P, Ignace Billiet I, Bostwick D et al. Comparative analysis of prostate-specific antigen free survival outcomes for patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treatment by radical therapy. Results from the Prostate Cancer Results Study Group. BJUI 109, Suppl. 1, 22-29, 2012

7 Comparative cost / QALY of guideline-recommended prostate cancer treatments: a UK cost perspective. PD 0371; 2nd ESTRO Forum, Geneva, Switzerland 2013.

8 Chen R.C., Clark J.A.; Talcott J.A.: Individualizing Quality-of-Life Outcomes Reporting: How localized prostate cancer treatments affect patients with different levels of baseline urinary, bowel and sexual function; Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009; 27 (24), 3916 – 3922.